🎁 Try our research reviews for free today Learn More
4 min read. Posted in Knee

Do ‘kissing knees’ increase the risk of ACL injury?

Written by Physio Network

A recent study aimed to explore the association between inward knee motion and risk of future non-contact ACL injury in elite female athletes.

We reviewed this study in the latest issue of our Research Reviews – where industry experts break down the most recent and clinically relevant studies, for immediate application in the clinic.

What you’ll read below is a snippet from the review.

Like the sound of these Research Reviews? – Learn more HERE

 

Back to the study!

 

STUDY TITLE: Kiss goodbye to the ‘kissing knees’: no association between frontal plane inward knee motion and risk of future non-contact ACL injury in elite female athletes – Nilstad et al (2021)

Study reviewed by Travis Pollen in the June 2021 issue of the Research Reviews

 

Key points from the study

  • This study showed no association between inward knee motion in a double-leg drop vertical jump and single leg squat, and non-contact ACL injury.
  • However, it remains to be seen whether inward knee motion should never be considered cause for concern, or whether we’re yet to find the correct test to assess it.

 

Background and Objective

The debate over whether pre-season screening tests are useful for identifying ACL injury risk has persisted for years, due in part to mixed findings in the research. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether there was an association between inward knee motion in the double-leg drop vertical jump and single leg squat, and future non-contact ACL injury, in a large sample of elite female athletes.

 

Methods

Over an 8-year period, the researchers screened 880 elite female handball and football athletes in their pre-seasons and registered non-contact injuries twice yearly. Screening included 2D video recordings of a double-leg drop vertical jump (from a 30-cm box) and single-leg squats. From video, the researchers analyzed several hip and knee kinematic variables corresponding to inward knee motion (see Figure 1).

image

 

Results

Out of the 880 athletes, there were 74 non-contact ACL injuries over the course of the study. There were no significant differences between the injured and uninjured athletes in any of the measures of inward knee motion (p > 0.05), and small effect sizes (Cohen’s d < 0.27).

 

Limitations

Each athlete in this study was tested once and then followed up for injury over multiple seasons. The median time between testing and injury was 434 days, with >60% of injuries occurring over a year after testing. With so much time between testing and injury, it raises the question of whether the athletes’ screening data still reflected their mechanics at the time of injury.

 

Clinical Implications

Previous studies showing inward knee motion increased the risk of non-contact ACL injury (e.g. Hewett et al., 2005) were limited by relatively small sample sizes and low numbers of injuries, which increase the risk of spurious findings. The large sample size and number of injuries in this study increase our confidence that the null findings are not a statistical error.

Although the authors suggest we “kiss goodbye to the ‘kissing knees’”, we must not overextend the conclusions. Given that the sample was elite female handball and football athletes, we should be cautious in generalizing the findings to males, non-elite athletes, and other sports.

Furthermore, this study only investigated two movements: a double-leg drop vertical jump, which isn’t specific to the single-leg context of ACL injuries; and single-leg squats, which aren’t specific to the speed and load of ACL injuries. Prospective research on single-leg drop vertical jumps and cutting maneuvers is crucial to furthering our understanding of the importance of inward knee motion in ACL injury.

image

Here’s what this review looks like in our June issue.

 

Do you want to save time by not having to wade through endless piles of studies?

Let us do the hard work for you!

Every month we summarise 12 of the most recent and clinically relevant studies in physio, for instant application in the clinic.

Here are the 11 other studies we’ve reviewed in our June issue just published:

  • Diagnosis of Cervical Radiculopathy
  • Return to Play Testing Following Bankart Lesion Repair
  • Stabilization vs Flexion Exercises for Spondylolisthesis
  • Return to Sport After Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures
  • Should Exercise be Painful for Chronic Pain Patients?
  • Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
  • Effect of Diagnostic Labels for Rotator Cuff Disorders
  • Resistance and Power Training to Prevent Frailty
  • Can Clinical Tests Identify Injury-Resistant Runners?
  • Effect of Physiotherapists’ Attitudes/Beliefs About LBP
  • Foot Posture and Ankle Range in Plantar Heel Pain

Want to treat knee pain more effectively? 🦵

You can now with guidance from world-leading expert Claire Patella!

Get her 2hr Masterclass on Patellofemoral Pain for FREE when you subscribe to our Research Reviews today  :raised_hands:

Learn more

My Rating

Don’t forget to share this blog!

Leave a comment

If you have a question, suggestion or a link to some related research, share below!

Clinically relevant content.

In your inbox. Every week.